Strengthening Airport Security: Identifying Internal Risks through Personality Analysis

8 April 2024 | Recruiting

Strayer Elene, Head of Program – Psychologist
Tournefeuille, France
April 2024


This article addresses the challenges of securing airport zones, emphasizing the critical importance of psychological analysis in the recruitment of security personnel. By employing proven psychological models, recruiters can systematically evaluate candidates to identify personality traits predictive of safe and reliable professional behavior. Assessments must transcend technical skills and consider intrapersonal qualities such as conscientiousness, open-mindedness, and integrity. By reinforcing recruitment and training processes to include thorough personality analysis, airport infrastructures can ensure competent, committed security teams capable of upholding high ethical standards.

Keywords: Airport Security, Recruitment, Personality Analysis, Security Culture

Securing airport zones is a significant challenge in a world where threats are rapidly evolving. In addition to external challenges, internal threats also represent a critical concern. Security personnel play a vital role in protecting airport infrastructures, and their aptitude and reliability are fundamental aspects to consider. However, evaluating these intrinsic qualities requires an in-depth analysis of candidates’ personalities. In this article, we explore the importance of this dimension in the recruitment process of security personnel. Using proven psychological models and adopting a holistic approach, airport infrastructures can proactively identify internal risks and significantly strengthen their security.

The Spectrum of Internal Threat: Identifying Risks through Personality

The security of airport zones primarily depends on the aptitude and reliability of security personnel, intrinsic qualities that require thorough psychological analysis. Recruiters must recognize the critical importance of this dimension. Several proven psychological models (Costa & McCrae, 1992; Eysenck, 1998; Goldberg, 1990) must be applied to systematically evaluate potential agents. These assessments, conducted by validated instruments and interviews led by clinical psychologists or trained and accredited professionals, detect personality nuances predictive of safe and reliable professional behavior. Conscientiousness, open-mindedness, and other relevant personality traits must be measured and considered in alignment with specific roles within security teams. The interpretation of results must go beyond numbers, incorporating nuanced discernment that reflects the values and culture of the organization. The training of evaluators then becomes an indispensable investment, ensuring the integrity of the recruitment process and the quality of selected profiles.

As such, evaluation should not be limited to identifying potential risks; it must also recognize and value candidates’ intrapersonal qualities. These traits should be considered just as important as technical skills to form agents capable of making ethical decisions in their duties. Adopting this holistic approach in candidate evaluation would build security teams that are not only competent but also deeply committed to professional ethical principles, defined by loyalty and impeccable integrity. Ultimately, it is through the prism of these behavioral values that airport security can strengthen its resilience and ensure effective and enduring protection.

Ethics and Professionalism: The Pillars of Airport Security

Excellence in airport security begins with a robust and innovative recruitment and training process. It becomes imperative to refine these processes to be in sync with current and future challenges. Several strategies should be used to strengthen the current processes. Developing targeted personality profiles that emphasize qualities such as resilience, adaptability, and ethical commitment would better define the sector’s expectations of tomorrow’s workforce. These criteria must be weighted according to their relevance for the specific role within the security team. Similarly, it becomes essential to evaluate these aspects through psychological tests as an integral part of the recruitment process for all potential agents. These assessments should be designed to identify not only positive personality traits but also indicators of risky behavior.

Secondly, it is also crucial to strengthen current training programs, particularly by enriching them with modules focused on crisis management, interpersonal communication, and ethical decision-making. The goal would be to develop not only technical skills but also relational and decision-making skills. Finally, instituting regular workshops and seminars to raise staff awareness of current and emerging threats, as well as the importance of ethics and integrity in their daily work, and instituting regular follow-ups of newly recruited agents, with periodic assessments of their adaptation and performance beyond technical performance, seems essential to ensure that the expectations of airport security are continually met.

These improvements require commitment at all levels of the organization and must be supported by clear policies and a corporate culture that values excellence in security. By adopting a holistic approach to recruitment and training, the infrastructures can ensure they have qualified, competent security teams fully committed to ensuring the safety of all users.

Forging the Future of Airport Security through Security Psychology

Thus, far from being superfluous, psychological analysis proves to be a cornerstone in the proactive security strategy, essential for preventing both internal and external threats. Proactively identifying risk profiles among candidates is a decisive step towards a robust security culture. By integrating the psychological dimension in recruitment and training, emphasizing ethics, integrity, probity, and effective communication, we lay the foundations for a secure environment where prevention takes precedence over reaction.

The future of airport security lies in an alliance between psychology and operational security. Personnel who are supported and psychologically assessed are better equipped to manage stress, thereby improving their effectiveness and strengthening overall security. The imperative to innovate with psychometric tools and tailored training programs is clear – we must continue to develop methods that fully embrace human complexity.

Investing in understanding the nuances of security agents’ personalities leads us not only to an improvement in safety but also inaugurates an era of empathic and resilient airport security. This human-centered approach is the foundation on which the promise of an airport sector equipped to face the challenges of tomorrow rests, reinforcing the trust of users and professionals in the field.

On the horizon, a landscape emerges where the psychological skills of agents, combined with enlightened security policies, constitute the best defense against constantly evolving threats. It is time to recognize that airport security cannot be complete without the deep integration of the principles of behavioral psychology and professional ethics in all its facets.

Therefore, it is essential that security operations managers, policymakers, and regulatory authorities fully embrace the potential of psychology in the selection and training of agents. It is appropriate to:

  1. Standardize Personality Analysis in Recruitment
  2. Invest in Continuing Education
  3. Continue Innovation in Psychometrics
  4. Cultivate a Proactive Security Culture
  5. Collaborate with Psychology Experts

By taking these measures, the airport sector can not only increase its security but also demonstrate a commitment to the well-being of its staff, cultivating a work environment where safety is a shared and valued responsibility. It is time to place security psychology at the forefront of our agenda for enhanced airport security, for the benefit of all.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice : The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5‑13.
Diard, É., & Vernet, H. (2020). Radicalisation au coeur des services publics : Sport, hôpitaux, transports…: ce qu’on ne vous dit pas (Première édition). JC Lattès.
Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Dimensions of personality. Transaction Publishers.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative « Description of Personality » : The Big-Five Factor Structure. 14.


Check out the full article :

Our latest news